NSW employer liable for COVID-19 death at work


An employer has been ordered to pay over $830,000 in death benefits and funeral costs due to COVID-19 death at work, and could potentially be on the hook for millions more.

Even with the prospect of over 90 per cent of adults becoming fully vaccinated, and with the community operating as ‘normal’ again, the risk of employees contracting COVID-19 at work will be a real prospect. After all, we will live with COVID-19 for the foreseeable future.  

While employers in retail, health, construction, emergency services and other COVID-essential industries have been balancing and managing these risks since the beginning of the pandemic, employers whose workforces have largely been working from their homes will now have to start managing these risks, too. 

This has the potential to open the floodgates for workers compensation claims, work health and safety breaches and other legal liabilities. 

The recent Sara v G & S Sara case is a perfect example of this. The NSW Personal Injury Commission recently ordered a NSW employer’s insurance provider to pay over $830,000 to the widow of an employee who died from COVID-19 – with millions more in medical bills currently being assessed.

Before we dive into the details of the case, it’s worth exploring how the pandemic has impacted legislation around workers compensation.

Workers compensation liability

Back in May 2020, as the pandemic hit its stride in some states, the NSW Government extended workers compensation legislation so that workers in essential industries (as specified above) who contracted COVID-19 were presumed eligible for workers compensation payments for the period of their absence from work as they recovered.

Essential workers are presumed to have contracted COVID-19 at work, unless proven otherwise. Death benefits for those who died as a result of COVID-19 contracted at work were also covered by the changes to the legislation.  

Fast forward to October 2021, and there have been almost 1600 COVID-19-related workers claims in NSW alone, with an expected gross cost of almost $14 million for 2021. In addition, and more alarming, is that it is predicted that claims under the NSW workers compensation regime will balloon to $638 million in the next 12 months. 

As Australia opens up again, claims are expected to rise further as the virus infects those who are vulnerable, unlucky or unvaccinated.  

If a worker can establish that they contracted COVID-19 in the course of their employment including while travelling to or from the workplace (for example by contact tracing or genome testing), they may be eligible to receive workers compensation payments, including death benefits.  

Work trip still counts as work

The NSW Personal Injury Commission recently ordered an employer’s insurance provider to pay death benefits, funeral expenses – which amounted to $834,000 – and almost four months of weekly compensation payments to the widow of a worker who was found to have contracted COVID-19 and subsequently died during a work trip.

The employee, who worked for a company that supplies dental technician products and services in Australia and America, had travelled to New York on 15 July 2020 for business.  One week later, he was taken by ambulance to hospital where he remained for four months until his death in November 2020, amassing around $11 million USD in medical bills. 

During this time, he suffered several heart attacks and strokes, but his cause of death was noted as “acute respiratory distress because of complications from COVID-19”.

The Commission is still considering whether medical expenses are payable to the employee’s widow.

iCare NSW argued that compensation was not payable under the workers compensation regime as the employee was not working for the Australian company when he contracted the virus, but rather he was working for its US affiliate, and that he could have contracted the virus when socialising on his trip, rather than when he was working.

The NSW Personal Injury Commission rejected these statements, finding that the employee received his normal pay, via his Australian payroll system, during his visit.

The Commission also pointed to evidence which suggested the employee contracted the virus either when he was boarding the plane in Sydney, when he passed through customs in San Francisco, or when he first arrived in New York (i.e. during work travel time). The Commission notes also mentioned that the employee was reluctant to wear masks, which may have increased risk of exposure.

This unfortunate case may potentially be the first of many, and highlights the importance of employers getting COVID-19 safety protocols right – first and foremost to protect their employees, but also to protect their business in the event of a fatal transmission. 

How to protect your people and business

So what are an employer and directors duties in this instance?

In the shadow of such massive potential liability, and where there are very clear work health and safety duties in relation to COVID-19 safety, employers across all states and territories should be looking at ensuring they apply and follow as many safety control measures as possible.  

Under relevant work health and safety legislation across Australia, both businesses, individual officers and directors may be at risk of being held liable for breaches of their positive obligation to exercise due diligence on work health and safety matters, which may include implementing and monitoring COVID-safe systems of work.  

All employers, officers and directors should consider the compulsory rules that apply to their organisations under various state and territory health orders at any given time.  

They should also consider best practice going forward, to reduce potential safety risks and liability. We recommend, at the very least, the following measures.  

  • Implement a COVID-19 Safety plan – This is mandatory for many types of businesses, and employers should ensure that they check their relevant state government website for updated information and requirements.  Employees should be familiar with such a plan and it should be regularly circulated among the workforce and to visitors to the workplace.  
  • Consider a vaccination policy for workers returning to the workplace – While vaccination freedoms under various health orders will not last forever, we recommend that employers apply a reasonable and appropriate vaccination policy, which captures the possible ongoing need to maintain full vaccination status and takes into account waning vaccine effectiveness.Given that the COVID-19 vaccines are scientifically proven, and are extremely effective ways to reduce transmission and severity of the virus, an employer that declines to enforce vaccination requirements may, in certain circumstances, face liability for not taking all reasonable steps to ensure the health and safety of their employees at workplaces (both vaccinated and unvaccinated – the latter being possibly more at risk).
  • Physical controls – The continued implementation of physical distancing through varied office fit outs, modified start and finish times, avoiding overcrowding in shared spaces, mask wearing in appropriate circumstances and providing appropriate hygiene equipment and instructions are still simple and effective transmission control measures. Health advice suggests that high vaccination rates do not justify abandonment of these measures at this time.  
  • Ventilation systems – There is growing evidence about the importance and effectiveness of ventilation and purification in reducing the spread of COVID-19.  We recommend undertaking a review and risk assessment of the ventilation in your workplace. Where appropriate, employers should be liaising with their landlord and building managers to increase airflow in high-traffic areas.
  • Ongoing monitoring and adapting – One of the biggest lessons over the past 18 months of the pandemic has been the need to constantly adapt and change to the evolving health environment. High vaccination status doesn’t allow for complacency, and businesses should ensure they have appropriate systems in place to take action and adapt systems if and when it becomes necessary.  

Aaron Goonrey is a Partner and Emma Lutwyche is a Senior Associate in Lander & Rogers’ Workplace Relations & Safety practice. 

guest
24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brad
Brad
1 month ago

There is no point in commenting on these articles, they’ll just get removed because it may offend the editor. AHRI, you have become a political propaganda machine and you do not represent the majority of HR professionals. That’s my opinion. Please be inclusive and not delete my beliefs.

Devine
Devine
1 month ago

Brad, you are right. AHRI are at it again. If you get to see this post, they do delete and censor. I have noticed this too, especially over the past 18 months. AHRI is pure propaganda. Not for equality, fairness, for the diversity of workers. Example, they tout “diversity” but it is superficial, because if they understood real diversity, say religious diversity, they would learn that there are people who object to say, alchohol, beef, or vaccinations on grounds of what the ingredients contain. Do your own research. Reading AHRI is not doing research. They are part of the coercion.… Read more »

Tim Newton
Tim Newton
1 month ago

Thanks Aaron and Emma for an informative view and providing recommendations for reducing COVID related health risks. Employers and workers can make up their own minds to what is relevant in their own workplace. At the very least, knowledge empowers people to have discussion and to take an informed position.

Anne
Anne
1 month ago

Can you please clarify the comment in this article – ‘While vaccination freedoms under various health orders will not last forever,’ and provide the basis for making this point? I have not seen or heard this anywhere else and it goes beyond anything I have read in any article before.

Karolina
Karolina
1 month ago

This one sided propaganda narrative is as transparent and lacks in credibility, as the body responsible for preparing it. This is neither balanced nor objective in its assessment. The continued misinformation about vaccinations, with a view to cause alarm, and fear, is appalling. In fact it is now understood and accepted scientifically, that vaccines are no more effective, and possibly have a higher rate of transmission. That being the case, perhaps employers should be guided by a more considered and helpful approach for risk mitigation and contingency planning, should a heavily vaccinated workforce become unwell, that it brings an entire… Read more »

1 2 3
More on HRM

NSW employer liable for COVID-19 death at work


An employer has been ordered to pay over $830,000 in death benefits and funeral costs due to COVID-19 death at work, and could potentially be on the hook for millions more.

Even with the prospect of over 90 per cent of adults becoming fully vaccinated, and with the community operating as ‘normal’ again, the risk of employees contracting COVID-19 at work will be a real prospect. After all, we will live with COVID-19 for the foreseeable future.  

While employers in retail, health, construction, emergency services and other COVID-essential industries have been balancing and managing these risks since the beginning of the pandemic, employers whose workforces have largely been working from their homes will now have to start managing these risks, too. 

This has the potential to open the floodgates for workers compensation claims, work health and safety breaches and other legal liabilities. 

The recent Sara v G & S Sara case is a perfect example of this. The NSW Personal Injury Commission recently ordered a NSW employer’s insurance provider to pay over $830,000 to the widow of an employee who died from COVID-19 – with millions more in medical bills currently being assessed.

Before we dive into the details of the case, it’s worth exploring how the pandemic has impacted legislation around workers compensation.

Workers compensation liability

Back in May 2020, as the pandemic hit its stride in some states, the NSW Government extended workers compensation legislation so that workers in essential industries (as specified above) who contracted COVID-19 were presumed eligible for workers compensation payments for the period of their absence from work as they recovered.

Essential workers are presumed to have contracted COVID-19 at work, unless proven otherwise. Death benefits for those who died as a result of COVID-19 contracted at work were also covered by the changes to the legislation.  

Fast forward to October 2021, and there have been almost 1600 COVID-19-related workers claims in NSW alone, with an expected gross cost of almost $14 million for 2021. In addition, and more alarming, is that it is predicted that claims under the NSW workers compensation regime will balloon to $638 million in the next 12 months. 

As Australia opens up again, claims are expected to rise further as the virus infects those who are vulnerable, unlucky or unvaccinated.  

If a worker can establish that they contracted COVID-19 in the course of their employment including while travelling to or from the workplace (for example by contact tracing or genome testing), they may be eligible to receive workers compensation payments, including death benefits.  

Work trip still counts as work

The NSW Personal Injury Commission recently ordered an employer’s insurance provider to pay death benefits, funeral expenses – which amounted to $834,000 – and almost four months of weekly compensation payments to the widow of a worker who was found to have contracted COVID-19 and subsequently died during a work trip.

The employee, who worked for a company that supplies dental technician products and services in Australia and America, had travelled to New York on 15 July 2020 for business.  One week later, he was taken by ambulance to hospital where he remained for four months until his death in November 2020, amassing around $11 million USD in medical bills. 

During this time, he suffered several heart attacks and strokes, but his cause of death was noted as “acute respiratory distress because of complications from COVID-19”.

The Commission is still considering whether medical expenses are payable to the employee’s widow.

iCare NSW argued that compensation was not payable under the workers compensation regime as the employee was not working for the Australian company when he contracted the virus, but rather he was working for its US affiliate, and that he could have contracted the virus when socialising on his trip, rather than when he was working.

The NSW Personal Injury Commission rejected these statements, finding that the employee received his normal pay, via his Australian payroll system, during his visit.

The Commission also pointed to evidence which suggested the employee contracted the virus either when he was boarding the plane in Sydney, when he passed through customs in San Francisco, or when he first arrived in New York (i.e. during work travel time). The Commission notes also mentioned that the employee was reluctant to wear masks, which may have increased risk of exposure.

This unfortunate case may potentially be the first of many, and highlights the importance of employers getting COVID-19 safety protocols right – first and foremost to protect their employees, but also to protect their business in the event of a fatal transmission. 

How to protect your people and business

So what are an employer and directors duties in this instance?

In the shadow of such massive potential liability, and where there are very clear work health and safety duties in relation to COVID-19 safety, employers across all states and territories should be looking at ensuring they apply and follow as many safety control measures as possible.  

Under relevant work health and safety legislation across Australia, both businesses, individual officers and directors may be at risk of being held liable for breaches of their positive obligation to exercise due diligence on work health and safety matters, which may include implementing and monitoring COVID-safe systems of work.  

All employers, officers and directors should consider the compulsory rules that apply to their organisations under various state and territory health orders at any given time.  

They should also consider best practice going forward, to reduce potential safety risks and liability. We recommend, at the very least, the following measures.  

  • Implement a COVID-19 Safety plan – This is mandatory for many types of businesses, and employers should ensure that they check their relevant state government website for updated information and requirements.  Employees should be familiar with such a plan and it should be regularly circulated among the workforce and to visitors to the workplace.  
  • Consider a vaccination policy for workers returning to the workplace – While vaccination freedoms under various health orders will not last forever, we recommend that employers apply a reasonable and appropriate vaccination policy, which captures the possible ongoing need to maintain full vaccination status and takes into account waning vaccine effectiveness.Given that the COVID-19 vaccines are scientifically proven, and are extremely effective ways to reduce transmission and severity of the virus, an employer that declines to enforce vaccination requirements may, in certain circumstances, face liability for not taking all reasonable steps to ensure the health and safety of their employees at workplaces (both vaccinated and unvaccinated – the latter being possibly more at risk).
  • Physical controls – The continued implementation of physical distancing through varied office fit outs, modified start and finish times, avoiding overcrowding in shared spaces, mask wearing in appropriate circumstances and providing appropriate hygiene equipment and instructions are still simple and effective transmission control measures. Health advice suggests that high vaccination rates do not justify abandonment of these measures at this time.  
  • Ventilation systems – There is growing evidence about the importance and effectiveness of ventilation and purification in reducing the spread of COVID-19.  We recommend undertaking a review and risk assessment of the ventilation in your workplace. Where appropriate, employers should be liaising with their landlord and building managers to increase airflow in high-traffic areas.
  • Ongoing monitoring and adapting – One of the biggest lessons over the past 18 months of the pandemic has been the need to constantly adapt and change to the evolving health environment. High vaccination status doesn’t allow for complacency, and businesses should ensure they have appropriate systems in place to take action and adapt systems if and when it becomes necessary.  

Aaron Goonrey is a Partner and Emma Lutwyche is a Senior Associate in Lander & Rogers’ Workplace Relations & Safety practice. 

guest
24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brad
Brad
1 month ago

There is no point in commenting on these articles, they’ll just get removed because it may offend the editor. AHRI, you have become a political propaganda machine and you do not represent the majority of HR professionals. That’s my opinion. Please be inclusive and not delete my beliefs.

Devine
Devine
1 month ago

Brad, you are right. AHRI are at it again. If you get to see this post, they do delete and censor. I have noticed this too, especially over the past 18 months. AHRI is pure propaganda. Not for equality, fairness, for the diversity of workers. Example, they tout “diversity” but it is superficial, because if they understood real diversity, say religious diversity, they would learn that there are people who object to say, alchohol, beef, or vaccinations on grounds of what the ingredients contain. Do your own research. Reading AHRI is not doing research. They are part of the coercion.… Read more »

Tim Newton
Tim Newton
1 month ago

Thanks Aaron and Emma for an informative view and providing recommendations for reducing COVID related health risks. Employers and workers can make up their own minds to what is relevant in their own workplace. At the very least, knowledge empowers people to have discussion and to take an informed position.

Anne
Anne
1 month ago

Can you please clarify the comment in this article – ‘While vaccination freedoms under various health orders will not last forever,’ and provide the basis for making this point? I have not seen or heard this anywhere else and it goes beyond anything I have read in any article before.

Karolina
Karolina
1 month ago

This one sided propaganda narrative is as transparent and lacks in credibility, as the body responsible for preparing it. This is neither balanced nor objective in its assessment. The continued misinformation about vaccinations, with a view to cause alarm, and fear, is appalling. In fact it is now understood and accepted scientifically, that vaccines are no more effective, and possibly have a higher rate of transmission. That being the case, perhaps employers should be guided by a more considered and helpful approach for risk mitigation and contingency planning, should a heavily vaccinated workforce become unwell, that it brings an entire… Read more »

1 2 3
More on HRM