The best and worst HR names


As corporate functions go, HR has been the most unsettled when it comes to describing itself. Finance is finance. Marketing is marketing. And although Human Resources left behind the ‘Personnel’ tag along with the metal filing cabinets a long time ago, the profession has never seemed entirely at ease with the names that replaced it.

Consider a few of the alternative HR names that have been adopted in a rebranding process designed to do what, exactly? Make HR sound more dynamic?

Human Resources departments are variously called (with help from Charles Coy at Cornerstone’s Rework):

  • Human Capital Management
  • People Operations (Popular title among tech firms such as Google and Uber)
  • People Resource Centre
  • Talent Management
  • People @ (Facebook’s choice)
  • Employee Experience (At Airbnb, HR roles responsible for employee health and happiness fall into this category)
  • Employee Success (Salesforce use this title for traditional HR functions such as recruitment but also employ newer roles here such as analysts who collaborate with IT to build and manage internal HR apps)
  • Partner (Human) Resources (Starbucks choice makes the ‘human’ element look interchangeable – with robots, perhaps?)

Another recent example of inventive HR names came to my attention last week when Xero, which produces online accounting software for small businesses, was named the Asia Pacific winner of LinkedIn’s ‘Bring Your Employer Brand to Life’ award.

When their CEO, Rod Drury, spoke about the people at Xero being the big differentiator, he said: “With the help of the human resources team (which we appropriately refer to as PX or People Experience, rather than HR), we have specifically moulded a unique environment to work.”

So move over HR, enter PX! Two far sexier letters.

Want to take your career as an HR professional to new heights? Signal to your professional network that your HR skills represent best practice by undergoing HR Certification with AHRI. Learn more here.

Head of People

Rebranding the HR function is a hot topic, particularly at the moment, with the effects of new technology transforming the role and responsibilities of HR before our eyes. Along with departmental name changes, job titles are moving away from the impersonal sounding Chief Human Resources Officer or Head of HR, to Chief People Officer or People Operations Manager or VP of People. Referring to employees as people rather than resources is one way to convince staff that they are valued and not simply gears in a machine and, that the Chief People Officer is there to advocate for them rather than simply ensure they obey the rules.

At social media management company, Buffer, they have taken this one step further, employing a Chief Happiness Officer; while he or she may not carry the same gravitas in the C-suite as the CFO, they are at least pretty clear about their responsibilities (although one wonders how they cope with having an off-day).

Changes in HR names, job and departmental titles are an indication of how more and more companies are realising that highly engaged, highly productive people are crucial to their success. As a result, HR is becoming more central to business strategy. So, does it really matter what HR names itself as long as it brings skills and knowledge and behaviours to the job at hand and performs them professionally?

Lyn Goodear, CEO at the Australian HR Institute, says confidence in the ability to do one’s job comes with professional certification and recognition of those standards from outside the profession. AHRI’s certification strategy, she says, is about creating a reliable, evidence-based consensus in relation to what is required to deliver good HR into an organisation.

“HR Certification, and the CPHR and FCPHR post-nominals that represent the independent assessment as having met the global practice standards, will create a confidence among employers in relation to the standard of HR practice they can count on.  And for HR practitioners – HR certification provides a reason to feel proud of their professional contribution and status as a valued business partner, regardless of the name of the department they work for!”

Editor’s note: Lyn Goodear’s tenure as AHRI CEO ended in January 2020, when Sarah McCann-Bartlett took over the role.

Subscribe to receive comments
Notify me of
guest

27 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jo Hanlon
Jo Hanlon
7 years ago

I personally DETEST the term Human Capital (Management) as it makes me think of a cattle yard for some reason. PX does sounds interesting however as I have long been searching for an acceptable (to me) alternative. People n Culture is another one used.

Irving Warren
Irving Warren
7 years ago

The USA Army has called its on base shops ‘PX Stores’ since World War 1 if not earlier. Usually referred to by the soldiery as ‘The PX’. Hardly a good name to adopt!

Dee Copeland
Dee Copeland
7 years ago

When “Human Resources” first hit our businesses, I initially thought how clinical it sounded…like your valued employee was just a ‘resource’ you can make money out of! Whilst in practice that is somewhat true, it still engenders a ‘I’m going to get all I can out of this person’ undertone…I believe “Personnel” explained the procedure better but we can’t go backwards and I’m sure many would protest. The question is do we need to change what we call the ‘people management’ function of our businesses and secondly, change to what? My philosophy is, “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it”!… Read more »

TJC
TJC
7 years ago

The term Human Resources sounds just fine. Leave it alone. There remain many ‘dumb’ names for HR such as People and Culture (rolls his eyes) and a plethora of others. People Experience sounds just as silly as the rest of the ‘other’ names we are required to deal with.

Tracey
Tracey
7 years ago

PX – please no! People Experience sounds like a department focussed solely on keeping employees happy. I’m well aware that our people need to be engaged and treated well but I feel that there’s a tendency at the moment for HR to be so much about looking after people and keeping them happy that the actual business they’re employed by is forgotten. I actually think it’s a tactic used by HR practitioners to justify their existence – let’s keep changing things. HR, or whatever you want to call it is about managing a resource, both in terms of the ‘touchy-feely’… Read more »

1 2 3 5
More on HRM
Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.

The best and worst HR names


As corporate functions go, HR has been the most unsettled when it comes to describing itself. Finance is finance. Marketing is marketing. And although Human Resources left behind the ‘Personnel’ tag along with the metal filing cabinets a long time ago, the profession has never seemed entirely at ease with the names that replaced it.

Consider a few of the alternative HR names that have been adopted in a rebranding process designed to do what, exactly? Make HR sound more dynamic?

Human Resources departments are variously called (with help from Charles Coy at Cornerstone’s Rework):

  • Human Capital Management
  • People Operations (Popular title among tech firms such as Google and Uber)
  • People Resource Centre
  • Talent Management
  • People @ (Facebook’s choice)
  • Employee Experience (At Airbnb, HR roles responsible for employee health and happiness fall into this category)
  • Employee Success (Salesforce use this title for traditional HR functions such as recruitment but also employ newer roles here such as analysts who collaborate with IT to build and manage internal HR apps)
  • Partner (Human) Resources (Starbucks choice makes the ‘human’ element look interchangeable – with robots, perhaps?)

Another recent example of inventive HR names came to my attention last week when Xero, which produces online accounting software for small businesses, was named the Asia Pacific winner of LinkedIn’s ‘Bring Your Employer Brand to Life’ award.

When their CEO, Rod Drury, spoke about the people at Xero being the big differentiator, he said: “With the help of the human resources team (which we appropriately refer to as PX or People Experience, rather than HR), we have specifically moulded a unique environment to work.”

So move over HR, enter PX! Two far sexier letters.

Want to take your career as an HR professional to new heights? Signal to your professional network that your HR skills represent best practice by undergoing HR Certification with AHRI. Learn more here.

Head of People

Rebranding the HR function is a hot topic, particularly at the moment, with the effects of new technology transforming the role and responsibilities of HR before our eyes. Along with departmental name changes, job titles are moving away from the impersonal sounding Chief Human Resources Officer or Head of HR, to Chief People Officer or People Operations Manager or VP of People. Referring to employees as people rather than resources is one way to convince staff that they are valued and not simply gears in a machine and, that the Chief People Officer is there to advocate for them rather than simply ensure they obey the rules.

At social media management company, Buffer, they have taken this one step further, employing a Chief Happiness Officer; while he or she may not carry the same gravitas in the C-suite as the CFO, they are at least pretty clear about their responsibilities (although one wonders how they cope with having an off-day).

Changes in HR names, job and departmental titles are an indication of how more and more companies are realising that highly engaged, highly productive people are crucial to their success. As a result, HR is becoming more central to business strategy. So, does it really matter what HR names itself as long as it brings skills and knowledge and behaviours to the job at hand and performs them professionally?

Lyn Goodear, CEO at the Australian HR Institute, says confidence in the ability to do one’s job comes with professional certification and recognition of those standards from outside the profession. AHRI’s certification strategy, she says, is about creating a reliable, evidence-based consensus in relation to what is required to deliver good HR into an organisation.

“HR Certification, and the CPHR and FCPHR post-nominals that represent the independent assessment as having met the global practice standards, will create a confidence among employers in relation to the standard of HR practice they can count on.  And for HR practitioners – HR certification provides a reason to feel proud of their professional contribution and status as a valued business partner, regardless of the name of the department they work for!”

Editor’s note: Lyn Goodear’s tenure as AHRI CEO ended in January 2020, when Sarah McCann-Bartlett took over the role.

Subscribe to receive comments
Notify me of
guest

27 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jo Hanlon
Jo Hanlon
7 years ago

I personally DETEST the term Human Capital (Management) as it makes me think of a cattle yard for some reason. PX does sounds interesting however as I have long been searching for an acceptable (to me) alternative. People n Culture is another one used.

Irving Warren
Irving Warren
7 years ago

The USA Army has called its on base shops ‘PX Stores’ since World War 1 if not earlier. Usually referred to by the soldiery as ‘The PX’. Hardly a good name to adopt!

Dee Copeland
Dee Copeland
7 years ago

When “Human Resources” first hit our businesses, I initially thought how clinical it sounded…like your valued employee was just a ‘resource’ you can make money out of! Whilst in practice that is somewhat true, it still engenders a ‘I’m going to get all I can out of this person’ undertone…I believe “Personnel” explained the procedure better but we can’t go backwards and I’m sure many would protest. The question is do we need to change what we call the ‘people management’ function of our businesses and secondly, change to what? My philosophy is, “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it”!… Read more »

TJC
TJC
7 years ago

The term Human Resources sounds just fine. Leave it alone. There remain many ‘dumb’ names for HR such as People and Culture (rolls his eyes) and a plethora of others. People Experience sounds just as silly as the rest of the ‘other’ names we are required to deal with.

Tracey
Tracey
7 years ago

PX – please no! People Experience sounds like a department focussed solely on keeping employees happy. I’m well aware that our people need to be engaged and treated well but I feel that there’s a tendency at the moment for HR to be so much about looking after people and keeping them happy that the actual business they’re employed by is forgotten. I actually think it’s a tactic used by HR practitioners to justify their existence – let’s keep changing things. HR, or whatever you want to call it is about managing a resource, both in terms of the ‘touchy-feely’… Read more »

1 2 3 5
Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.
More on HRM